Skip to main content

What Has Made Me Who I Am Does Not Have to Be What I Become


What Has Made Me Who I Am Does Not Have to Be What I Become

 

I’m a high school senior from a small town in Central Washington. Since I was thirteen years old, I’ve known exactly what I want to do “when I grew up”: I want to become a professor of linguistics at a major research university. I want to research and write papers and teach. Because I have had this answer ready for so long, people started to ask me what I want to specialize in. I’d say that I wasn’t sure, but perhaps an indigenous language family in Central America, because I already spoke Spanish and had studied the culture and politics of the region. Then it struck me: what has made me who I am does not have to be what I become.

This was a shocking, indeed liberating idea for me. It seemed so obvious, that I was going to college to learn new things and have new experiences, and yet it seemed contrary to everything I had learned. Suddenly, this simple idea permeated every aspect of my life. It became a mantra, a lifeline.

My Spanish teacher, a woman I admire very much as a teacher, a Christian, and a friend, graduated from the high school where she now teaches, attended the local community college and then transferred to the state university forty-five minutes away.

What has made me who I am does not have to be what I become.

My mother has spent her life fighting the bureaucracy of special education for my little sister. She stays home because my sister needs someone to be her everything. My mom is strong and brave and amazing. I’m exhausted just watching her.

What has made me who I am does not have to be what I become.

For much of my childhood, my dad was drunk. For my brother and I, it became our normal. We learned to anticipate when our father would be the brilliant, selfless man he is, and we learned when we couldn’t count on him to be our father. One day, my brother told me he was never going to drink and demanded I promise the same. My brother was ten years old. I didn’t know what to tell him then, but had I known it then, I would have said “What has made us who we are does not have to be what we become.

Selah.

What if we taught the Gospel like this? Because that’s what it is. The incredible, life-changing message that the experiences and conditions of our lives are not permanent. That what we know to be true, to be our reality, is dynamic.

I’d like to tell this to my peers. Tell them that our lives do not have to be defined by our grade point averages. The letters on our varsity jackets. The “troublemaker” prophecies that have been fulfilling themselves since elementary school.

What if we made this the new evangelism? I grew into God around the Billy Graham four-step evangelistic recipe. The one that starts with “God loves you,” then somehow turns that into “Repent, sinner, before the flames of hell consume you.” This is not just simplified. It’s simplistic. Jesus and his disciples smashed through the social categories of his time, eating with sinners and speaking of good folk on the wrong side of the track. They themselves bore the burden of every label extant in the first century.

In Why Did Jesus, Moses, the Buddha, and Mohammed Cross the Road? Brian McLaren refers to “a crucified man and a ragtag band of his followers.” The Gospel is the good news that a ragtag band can unite beneath one man on a cross. That we too can smash through all our labels and make something beautiful.

In recognizing that formative or past experiences are not defining, we must also recognize that they do contribute to a person’s identity and self-concept. What has made me who I am is, of course, a part of who I am. The communities from which I come – the small town, the world of special needs – mean very, very much to me. I never want to forget them, and they will continue to inform my decisions. My faith means that I am free to challenge them and to separate my identity from them, but it bears with it the choice to continue to interact in them.

Paul is the foremost example of this. He was the ultimate model of a man born again in Christ…but he carried with him the world he knew before, and that made his legacy. He could become the Apostle to the Gentiles, for he knew them. He could be, at the same time, one of them and one in Christ.

The past doesn’t let go easily, and for all the good our past lives contain, they carry baggage, too. It doesn’t go away with one prayer, unfortunately. The sort of evangelism told in before-and-after stories, however, seems to forget this. It expects its converts to be instantly cured, and in doing so, forces far too many into silence as they feel ashamed to admit that After isn’t all smiles and praise.

Brian McLaren again hits the nail on the head when he describes “the new humanity that transcends and includes all previous identities.” What has made us who we are does not have to be what we become. It is a part of us. Not all of us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Exile Narrative and Latin American Culture

The following was written for a Chicano History class I'm taking right now through my local community college.             The “Indigenous Problem” of Porfirio Diaz’s regime fascinated me in that dark way history’s ugly sides often do. That lesson functioned as a cautionary tale of the real, tangible impact, to all sides and parties, of systematic discrimination and its targeted destruction of a group’s narrative agency. However, the unintended consequences of Diaz’s move to replace the Mexican working population provide another lesson, a pragmatically optimistic trust in the resilience of humanity and our innate tendency toward agency and self-determination, the very tendencies that, once the many layers of prejudices, of injustices, and of imperialist vices are stripped away, form the core of the original American experiment.               Porfirio Diaz, dictator of Mexico for thirty-four years, created a “technocracy,” ruling with a group known as the Científicos. His g

Welcome

I don’t know how to begin this, but I suppose that’s fitting, as this is largely a blog about what I don’t know. I subtitled this “Mixed-up Musings,” because I’m hoping to puzzle out some of the many questions I have, and maybe contribute to the greater dialogue along the way. In the interest of full disclosure, I’m beginning this blog as part of my high school senior project. My first love, what I intend to pursue for my career, is linguistics (hence the name of this blog), but at this stage in my life, on the verge of so much change, what I need to write about is religion and faith. I write to figure out things I don’t understand, and much of my writing lately, both fiction and nonfiction, deals with religion. I started Babel Scattered as a way to organize these thoughts and writings and see what comes of it.   What am I trying to get out of this experiment? Not wisdom or enlightenment or fame or fortune. Nothing spectacular. I have no agenda, no thesis. Only a search. I’m